- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:44:24 -0500
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
The members of the W3C probably require more justification for this group spending more time on the SemWeb where the business case has not been made and less time on the Web Services domain where a business case is being made. Substantial investments are being made in fielding web service technologies for mission critical systems including homeland security. The statement 'this is hard' from the mail cited below is not convincing given that web services are being fielded. It may be the case that no obstacles to their implementation that challenge the architecture have been presented, so no actions are required (ie, works fine with OFWeb). len From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com Our main subject for the upcoming face to face meeting is "TAG Directions". Tim set down some ideas in the note at [1], and I've been giving a lot of thought to where I think we should go. The attached HTML document sets out some of my ideas. Noah [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Apr/0054.html
Received on Friday, 3 June 2005 20:44:32 UTC