- From: Peter F Brown <peter@justbrown.net>
- Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 02:33:54 -0700
- To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <clbullar@ingr.com>, "'Tim Berners-Lee'" <timbl@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
Given that the current top level domains already consist of non mutually-exclusive sets, I don't see why the TAG should get exercised about the issue at all. Either we re-engineer from the bottom: but no-one is going to stop the world while we get off and fix it; or we accept that there is no coherent taxonomy from a single root, and it's thus a free-for-all. Sorry for sounding cynical, but it's a bit late in the day. The best you can ask for is damage-limitation and some valid "useful" criteria for accepting or rejecting new proposals Peter Brown | -----Original Message----- | From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] | On Behalf Of Bullard, Claude L (Len) | Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 1:47 PM | To: 'Tim Berners-Lee'; 'www-tag@w3.org' | Subject: RE: Thoughts on top-level domains, esp. .mobi | | | While agreeing in whole to the position that it is actively | harmful to divide web addressing into device-centric domains, | the comment | | .."it is unwise, as an architectural principle, to put | semantics into names" | | is a little over the top if considered outside the context of | web naming which it is assumed, subsumes | any namespace used on the web (the tree model). In contrast to | trademarks as brands, service or test marks are created | precisely to assign semantics to a name typically through the | pairing of the mark with conformance tests that prove that | the test article is a conformant instance. In such an | application of a name, a tight coupling of semantics and a | name is the precise intent. Were service marks a tree | system, one would encounter the problems you note. | | Good article. | | len | | | From: Tim Berners-Lee [mailto:timbl@w3.org] | | In writing up some problems as I see them with the proposed | .mobi top level domain, I found i had half the document full | of general reasons why new domains are a bad idea, which | would apply to many if not all of the new proposals, and the | other half specific problems with .mobi. | | The writeup is at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/TLD | | Comments welcome -- I intend to send it to the formal comment | list next week. | This is a personal view only. It is not a W3c view. I would | recommend that others also send their feelings to the official list. | | | Tim Berners-Lee | | | ICANN Public comment form: | | http://www.icann.org/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/stld-public-comments.htm | | RFP: | http://www.icann.org/tlds/new-stld-rfp/new-stld-rfp-24jun03.htm | | General comments: | stld-rfp-general@icann.org | |
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 05:34:20 UTC