- From: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 20:15:22 -0700
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On May 1, 2004, at 11:28 AM, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > If I'm reading this right, and I'm not sure I am by any means, then > this is another whack at the packaging problem, similar to XOP. Boy, you're smarter than I am. Someone sent me back-channel mail, explaining that this was a way of getting a SOAP+attachments-like effect but without going all the way to XOM/MTOM. I would never have figured that out from reading the draft though. And that section I called about motivation is really lame. Without any comment on the technical virtues of this proposal, some editorial polishing would help. -Tim
Received on Saturday, 1 May 2004 23:15:25 UTC