- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:11:41 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1077811900.1075.974.camel@seabright>
Hello,
The agenda of the TAG's 2 March ftf meeting is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/02-tag.html
========================================================
Agenda of 2 March 2004 TAG FTF meeting in Cannes-Mandelieu (France)
1. Administrative (20min)
1. Roll call.
2. Proposed to accept minutes of the [7]23 Feb teleconf
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Proposed next meeting: 16 March.
5. Proposed to meet 9-11 August in Ottawa (Confirm).
6. Proposed to meet ftf Nov in Boston:
[7] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/23-tag-summary.html
[8] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/02-tag.html
1.1 Review of open action items related to issues
The TAG expects to review the list of [9]open actions by owner and to
close any that are obvious to close. TAG participants are encouraged
to review this list before the meeting, as well as other action items
listed in this agenda.
[9] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
1.2 Review of materials for plenary day
1. [10]Slides from DO on versioning/extensibility
2. Slides from RF on Web identifiers
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Feb/0148.html
2. Technical
See also [11]open actions by owner and [12]open issues.
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1
Also, issues that are open and that we expect to close by the end of
last call:
* [13]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
* [14]whenToUseGet-7
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#whenToUseGet-7
2.1 Follow-up on namespaceDocument-8
* [15]namespaceDocument-8
1. Review finding outline from PC
2. Agree to next steps w.r.t. RDDL Note and Finding.
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#namespaceDocument-8
2.2 Update on findings
* [16]qnameAsId-18
+ 14 Jan 2004 draft finding "[17]Using Qualified Names (QNames)
as Identifiers in Content"
+ Action CL, TB, TBL 2004/01/26: Read finding.
[16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#qnameAsId-18
[17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids-2004-01-14
2.3 Web Architecture Document Last Call
Review and acknowledge comments sent to
[18]public-webarch-comments@w3.org.
* Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
minutes of that meeting for details).
* Action NW 2004/02/09: Respond to Hammond's comments in light of
TAG discussion.
* Action PC 2004/02/09: Respond to Tom Worthington's comments in
light of TAG discussion. [19]Done. [20]Reviewer satisfied that TAG
has done due diligence, but unhappy with outcome
* Action PC 2004/02/09: Respond to Martin Dürst, acknowledging the
dependency ([21]Done).
* Action TBL 2004/02/09: Respond to David Booth on TAG's choice of
agent - the status quo.
* Action SW 2004/02/09: Propose to the TAG a reponse to Patrick
Stickler's message. ([22]Done)
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
[19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0014.html
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0019.html
[21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0016.html
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Feb/0124.html
2.3.1 Peter Patel-Schneider
1. [23]Comments from Peter Patel-Schneider
2. Many of the comments concern notions of authority and ownership;
see related [24]comment from David Booth about ns documents.
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0010.html
2.3.2 Sandro Hawke
1. [25]Comments from Sandro Hawke
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0018.html
2.3.3 Dominique Hazael-Massieux
1. [26]Comments from Dominique Hazael-Massieux
2. [27]Comments about metadata
3. [28]Comments about conformance
[26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0020.html
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0024.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0023.html
2.3.4 Danny Weitzner
1. [29]Comments from Danny Weitzner
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0022.html
2.3.5 David Booth
1. [30]Question about ns docs providing definitive info
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0026.html
2.3.6 Sergio Rodrigues
1. [31]Question about XDI and XRI w.r.t. Webarch
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0028.html
2.3.7 Jacek Kopecky
1. [32]AWWW LC comments
[32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0030.html
2.3.8 Martin Dürst
1. [33]principles, etc.
[33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0031.html
2.3.9 Augusto Aguilera
1. [34]Comments on Arch Doc on behalf of DIWG
[34] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/att-0032/DIWG-TAG-Comments-Feb2004.htm
3. Liaisons
See [35]liaisons page.
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/02/TAG-Liasons.html
3.1 XML Core WG (14:00-15:30)
1. [36]xlinkScope-23
2. [37]xmlChunk-44
3. Comments on LC Webarch.
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xlinkScope-23
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#xmlChunk-44
3.2 Voice WG (16:00-17:30)
1. (Silent) Recovery from error in the voice context.
2. Mixed markup (e.g., Voice+SMIL).
3. Ideas for Voice V3.
4. Comments on LC Webarch.
_________________________________________________________________
The TAG does not expect to discuss the topics below this line.
4. Follow-up on Internationalization Issues
* [38]charmodReview-17
1. [39]actions
2. TAG finding related to adoption of Charmod? See [40]mail from
TBL
* [41]URIEquivalence-15
* [42]IRIEverywhere-27
[38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#charmodReview-17
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions.html#charmodReview-17
[40] http://www.w3.org/mid/361483C6-96E6-11D7-9C47-000393914268@w3.org
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#URIEquivalence-15
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#IRIEverwhere-27
5. Status report on these findings
See also [43]TAG findings
* [44]abstractComponentRefs-37:
+ 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[45]Abstract Component References"
* [46]contentPresentation-26:
+ 30 June 2003 draft finding "[47]Separation of semantic and
presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
architecturally sound"
* [48]metadataInURI-31
* [49]siteData-36
+ "[50]There is no such thing as a Web site"
[43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[45] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
[48] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
[50] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36
6. Other action items
* Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
* Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
* Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2004/02/26 16:08:46 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:11:41 UTC