[Agenda] 23 Feb 2004 TAG teleconf (TechPlenary, namespaceDocument-8, Webarch LC)

Hello, 

The agenda of the 23 Feb 2004 TAG teleconference is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.

  - Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/23-tag.html
========================================================

            Agenda of 23 February 2004 TAG Teleconference

1. Administrative (20min)

    1. Roll call.
    2. Proposed to accept minutes of the [7]9 Feb teleconf
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Proposed next meeting: 2 Mar 2004
    5. Proposed to cancel 8 Mar 2004 teleconference (and reconvene 15
       Mar)
    6. Finalize meeting dates in August in Ottowa?
       Action PC 2004/02/09: Propose August ftf meeting dates. ([9]done)

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/09-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/23-tag.html
      [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Feb/0068.html

  1.1 Technical Plenary

    1. [10]Liaisons update
    2. Plenary day planning
         1. Intro to TAG and Web Arch (Stuart)
         2. Namespace documents (Dan C)
         3. Namespace documents (Dan C)
         4. Web Identifiers (Roy F? Qnames, Ids, FragID, URI andIRI)
            Action SW 2004/02/09: Find a volunteer to discuss identifiers
            at Tech Plenary
         5. Boilerplate:
              1. Outline issue
              2. Why TAG interested. What's difficult?
              3. Known positions around issue
              4. Encourage discussion/debate
    3. [11]TAG 2 Mar 2004 ftf meeting page
          + Review Plenary day materials
          + Webarch Last Call
          + Liasons with other WGs

     [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/02/TAG-Liasons
     [11] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/02-tag-mtg.html

2. Technical

   See also [12]open actions by owner and [13]open issues.

     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1

  2.1 Update on findings

     * [14]qnameAsId-18
          + 14 Jan 2004 draft finding "[15]Using Qualified Names (QNames)
            as Identifiers in Content"
          + Action CL, TB, TBL 2004/01/26: Read finding due 9 Feb 2004.
     * [16]contentTypeOverride-24:
          + 18 Feb 2004 draft finding "[17]Authoritative Metadata"

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#qnameAsId-18
     [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids-2004-01-14
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20040218.html

  2.2 Follow-up on [18]namespaceDocument-8

     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#namespaceDocument-8

     * [19]namespaceDocument-8
         1. [20]RDDL2 Background from Tim Bray.
         2. [21]grokRDDL.xsl mapping to RDF from Dan Connolly.

     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#namespaceDocument-8
     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0045.html
     [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0026.html

  2.3 Web Architecture Document Last Call

     * Issues that are open and that we expect to close by the end of
       last call:
          + [22]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
          + [23]whenToUseGet-7
          + [24]contentTypeOverride-24
     * Review and acknowledge comments sent to
       [25]public-webarch-comments@w3.org
     * Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
       minutes of that meeting for details).
     * Action NW 2004/02/09: Respond to Hammond's comments in light of
       TAG discussion.
     * Action PC 2004/02/09: Respond to Tom Worthington's comments in
       light of TAG discussion. [26]Done. [27]Reviewer satisfied that TAG
       has done due diligence, but unhappy with outcome
     * Action PC 2004/02/09: Respond to Martin Dürst, acknowledging the
       dependency ([28]Done).
     * Action TBL 2004/02/09: Respond to David Booth on TAG's choice of
       agent - the status quo.
     * Action SW 2004/02/09: Propose to the TAG a reponse to Patrick
       Stickler's message.

     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#whenToUseGet-7
     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#contentTypeOverride-24
     [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
     [26] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0014.html
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0019.html
     [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0016.html

    2.3.1 Peter Patel-Schneider

    1. [29]Comments from Peter Patel-Schneider

     [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0010.html

    2.3.2 Sandro Hawke

    1. [30]Comments from Sandro Hawke

     [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0018.html

    2.3.3 Dominique Hazael-Massieux

    1. [31]Comments from Dominique Hazael-Massieux

     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0020.html

    2.3.4 Danny Weitzner

    1. [32]Comments from Danny Weitzner

     [32] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0022.html

     _________________________________________________________________

   The TAG does not expect to discuss the topics below this line.

4. Follow-up on Internationalization Issues

     * [33]charmodReview-17
         1. [34]actions
         2. TAG finding related to adoption of Charmod? See [35]mail from
            TBL
     * [36]URIEquivalence-15
     * [37]IRIEverywhere-27

     [33] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#charmodReview-17
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions.html#charmodReview-17
     [35] http://www.w3.org/mid/361483C6-96E6-11D7-9C47-000393914268@w3.org
     [36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1#URIEquivalence-15
     [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#IRIEverwhere-27

5. Status report on these findings

   See also [38]TAG findings
     * [39]abstractComponentRefs-37:
          + 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[40]Abstract Component References"
     * [41]contentPresentation-26:
          + 30 June 2003 draft finding "[42]Separation of semantic and
            presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
            architecturally sound"
     * [43]metadataInURI-31
     * [44]siteData-36
          + "[45]There is no such thing as a Web site"

     [38] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
     [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
     [45] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36

6. Other action items

     * Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
     * Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
       on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
     * Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san

     _________________________________________________________________


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2004/02/19 20:20:14 $

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 15:32:26 UTC