Re: Arch Doc: 11 November 2003 Editor's Draft

Ok, but I think this is a pretty major deal, and just the kind of
thing (removing ambiguity) that you want to have resolved before
requesting broad(er) review.


On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:21:31PM -0800, Paul Cotton wrote:
> Mark
> > Another comment is that I feel that before going to last call, 
> > that the issue I previously raised[1] regarding the 
> > (mis?)use of RFC 2119, needs to be resolved.
> I am sure many originators of TAG issues would argue that THEIR issue
> should be resolved before an initial Last Call of the Architecture
> document.  
> But given that the Architecture document is a living document, I believe
> the TAG must balance getting an initial version done with trying to
> close all our outstanding issues.  
> Currently I favor a very date driven approach to getting a Last Call WD
> out for review and would prefer that the we concentrate on fixing the
> current document and not add a large number of issues to our To Do list.
> /paulc 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.

Received on Sunday, 16 November 2003 01:03:29 UTC