- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:05:36 -0500
- To: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Ok, but I think this is a pretty major deal, and just the kind of thing (removing ambiguity) that you want to have resolved before requesting broad(er) review. Mark. On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:21:31PM -0800, Paul Cotton wrote: > Mark > > > Another comment is that I feel that before going to last call, > > that the issue I previously raised[1] regarding the > > (mis?)use of RFC 2119, needs to be resolved. > > I am sure many originators of TAG issues would argue that THEIR issue > should be resolved before an initial Last Call of the Architecture > document. > > But given that the Architecture document is a living document, I believe > the TAG must balance getting an initial version done with trying to > close all our outstanding issues. > > Currently I favor a very date driven approach to getting a Last Call WD > out for review and would prefer that the we concentrate on fixing the > current document and not add a large number of issues to our To Do list. > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > > > > -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Sunday, 16 November 2003 01:03:29 UTC