- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 07:43:13 +0900
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>, www-tag@w3.org
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 15:05, Mark Baker wrote: [...] > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:21:31PM -0800, Paul Cotton wrote: > > Mark > > > > > Another comment is that I feel that before going to last call, > > > that the issue I previously raised[1] regarding the > > > (mis?)use of RFC 2119, needs to be resolved. > > > > I am sure many originators of TAG issues would argue that THEIR issue > > should be resolved before an initial Last Call of the Architecture > > document. > > > > But given that the Architecture document is a living document, I believe > > the TAG must balance getting an initial version done with trying to > > close all our outstanding issues. Hmm... I guess there are issues and Issues. I don't think Mark is referring to any of the "first class" issues in our issues list, but we did discuss the (mis?) use of RFC2119 a considerable amount in the last couple days. Reviewing the comment from 27 Sep, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Sep/0191.html I think that some edits we agreed to in the meeting are likely to address it to Mark's satisfaction. Stay tuned... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 16 November 2003 17:43:14 UTC