RE: Arch Doc: 11 November 2003 Editor's Draft


> Another comment is that I feel that before going to last call, 
> that the issue I previously raised[1] regarding the 
> (mis?)use of RFC 2119, needs to be resolved.

I am sure many originators of TAG issues would argue that THEIR issue
should be resolved before an initial Last Call of the Architecture

But given that the Architecture document is a living document, I believe
the TAG must balance getting an initial version done with trying to
close all our outstanding issues.  

Currently I favor a very date driven approach to getting a Last Call WD
out for review and would prefer that the we concentrate on fixing the
current document and not add a large number of issues to our To Do list.


Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329


Received on Sunday, 16 November 2003 00:21:33 UTC