- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: 01 May 2003 10:57:59 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hello,
The agenda for the TAG's 5 May 2003 teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.
Thank you,
_ Ian
[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag.html
==========================================================
Agenda for 5 May 2003 TAG teleconference
Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
1. Administrative (45min)
1. Confirm Chair (NW), Scribe (IJ). Regrets: SW.
2. Accept [7]28 Apr teleconference minutes?
3. Accept this [8]agenda?
4. Next meeting: 12 May with Voice Browser WG?
[7] http://www.w3.org/2003/04/28-tagmem-irc
[8] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag.html
1.1 Meeting planning
* Please register for AC meeting and WWW2003 if you are a speaker.
* TAG virtual meetings 2 and 19 June (no meeting 16 June).
Action SW 2003/04/14: Propose meeting times, structure to TAG.
1.2 W3C Track Presentation
* [9]W3C track
* Action PC 2003/04/14: Propose TAG's WWW2003 report to TAG. Due 5
May
[9] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm
1.3 TAG report at AC meeting
1. [10]Suggestions for TAG presentation at May AC Meeting from DO and
PC
2. Action DO, CL: Present TAG's AC meeting report to TAG. Due 5 May
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0027.html
2. Technical (45min)
2.1 Issues the TAG intends to discuss
* [11]whenToUseGet-7
+ Solicit review of [12]revised draft finding from IJ?
+ IJ proposal: Take into account DC's comments and then solicit
review.
* [13]contentTypeOverride-24
+ Solicit review of [14]draft finding from IJ?
+ Action SW, NW 2003/04/17: Read Client handling of MIME
headers. If +2, then IJ will send to www-tag.
* [15]uriMediaType-9
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
+ IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
(see [16]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
this issue?
* [17]abstractComponentRefs-37
+ See [18]issue description from David Orchard
+ Next steps?
* [19]namespaceDocument-8
+ Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
canonical mapping to RDF.
+ Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
pointing to the RDDL Note. See [20]comments from Paul
regarding TB theses.
+ Action TB 2003/04/28: Draft a TAG opinion on the use of URNs
for namespace names, for review by the TAG
o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
institutional commitment and frequency of use.
* Other issues?
* Updates on action items?
[11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
[12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
[14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20030405.html
[15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
[18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
[19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html
2.2 Architecture document
See also: [21]findings.
1. [22]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
1. Completed action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st
para under [23]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft. See [24]request
from DanC to consider this subsumed based on 26 Mar 2003 Arch
Doc text.
2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
and put into DC writing.
4. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
chapter of arch doc related to [25]message passing, a dual of
shared state.
[21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
[22] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
[23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use
[24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0119.html
[25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html
2.3 Issues that have associated action items
* [26]xlinkScope-23
+ Status report?
+ See [27]draft, and [28]SW message to CG chairs.
* [29]IRIEverywhere-27
+ Completed action TB 2003/04/14: Draft a proposed step forward
on IRI 27. ([30]Done). In that [31]email, TB proposes to
close this issue.
+ Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
+ Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
that handle IRIs are inconsistent. (Action unclear from 28
Apr minutes).
* [32]URIEquivalence-15
+ SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [33]Tim Bray text has
been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
issue to pending state.
* [34]xmlIDSemantics-32
+ See [35]Chris Lilley draft finding. Next steps?
* [36]siteData-36
+ Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
* [37]xmlFunctions-34
+ Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
XML Core work. See [38]email from TimBL capturing some of the
issues.
* [39]binaryXML-30
+ Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
adding to survey.
+ Next steps to finding? See [40]summary from Chris.
* [41]contentPresentation-26
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
Due 3 March.
* [42]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
+ Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
desideratum ([43]RQ-23).
* [44]HTTPSubstrate-16
+ Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
to be excluded from RFC 3205
+ See [45]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
* [46]errorHandling-20
+ Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
(1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
has been signaled. Due first week of March.
* [47]metadataInURI-31
+ Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
+ See also [48]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
schemes instead of headers
* [49]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
1. Connection to content negotiation?
2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
3. No actions associated / no owner.
[26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
[27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
[29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
[30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
[33] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
[34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
[35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
[36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
[37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
[38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
[39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
[40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
[41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
[42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
[43] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
[44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
[45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
[46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
[47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
[48] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
[49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
3. Other actions
* Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in
May.
_________________________________________________________________
Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
Last modified: $Date: 2003/05/01 14:50:05 $
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 10:58:05 UTC