W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2003

[Agenda] 5 May 2003 TAG teleconf (TAG presentations, draft findings, uriMediaType-9, abstractComponentRefs-37)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: 01 May 2003 10:57:59 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1051801079.14756.41.camel@seabright>


The agenda for the TAG's 5 May 2003 teleconf is available
as HTML [1] and as text below.

Thank you,

 _ Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag.html


                   Agenda for 5 May 2003 TAG teleconference

   Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
   business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (45min)

    1. Confirm Chair (NW), Scribe (IJ). Regrets: SW.
    2. Accept [7]28 Apr teleconference minutes?
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting: 12 May with Voice Browser WG?

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/04/28-tagmem-irc
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/05-tag.html

  1.1 Meeting planning

     * Please register for AC meeting and WWW2003 if you are a speaker.
     * TAG virtual meetings 2 and 19 June (no meeting 16 June).
       Action SW 2003/04/14: Propose meeting times, structure to TAG.

  1.2 W3C Track Presentation

     * [9]W3C track
     * Action PC 2003/04/14: Propose TAG's WWW2003 report to TAG. Due 5

      [9] http://www2003.org/t_www.htm

  1.3 TAG report at AC meeting

    1. [10]Suggestions for TAG presentation at May AC Meeting from DO and
    2. Action DO, CL: Present TAG's AC meeting report to TAG. Due 5 May

     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0027.html

2. Technical (45min)

  2.1 Issues the TAG intends to discuss

     * [11]whenToUseGet-7
          + Solicit review of [12]revised draft finding from IJ?
          + IJ proposal: Take into account DC's comments and then solicit
     * [13]contentTypeOverride-24
          + Solicit review of [14]draft finding from IJ?
          + Action SW, NW 2003/04/17: Read Client handling of MIME
            headers. If +2, then IJ will send to www-tag.
     * [15]uriMediaType-9
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
            discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
          + IANA appears to have responded to the spirit of this draft
            (see [16]email from Chris Lilley).What's required to close
            this issue?
     * [17]abstractComponentRefs-37
          + See [18]issue description from David Orchard
          + Next steps?
     * [19]namespaceDocument-8
          + Action TB 2003/04/07: Prepare RDDL Note. Include in status
            section that there is TAG consensus that RDDL is a suitable
            format for representations of an XML namespace. Clean up
            messy section 4 of RDDL draft and investigate and publish a
            canonical mapping to RDF.
          + Action PC 2003/04/07: Prepare finding to answer this issue,
            pointing to the RDDL Note. See [20]comments from Paul
            regarding TB theses.
          + Action TB 2003/04/28: Draft a TAG opinion on the use of URNs
            for namespace names, for review by the TAG
               o RF: Folks assume that because the specs say so, URNs
                 will be persisitent. But persistence is a function of
                 institutional commitment and frequency of use.
     * Other issues?
     * Updates on action items?

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#whenToUseGet-7
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/get7-20020610.html
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20030405.html
     [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
     [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0302.html
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2003/05/24-tag-summary.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0089.html
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Apr/0046.html

  2.2 Architecture document

   See also: [21]findings.
    1. [22]26 Mar 2003 Working Draft of Arch Doc:
         1. Completed action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st
            para under [23]2.2.4 of 6 Feb 2003 draft. See [24]request
            from DanC to consider this subsumed based on 26 Mar 2003 Arch
            Doc text.
         2. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
            incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design
         3. Action DO 2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
            services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste
            and put into DC writing.
         4. Action DC 2003/03/17: : Write some text for interactions
            chapter of arch doc related to [25]message passing, a dual of
            shared state.

     [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [22] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-webarch-20030326/
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030206#uri-use
     [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0119.html
     [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html

  2.3 Issues that have associated action items

     * [26]xlinkScope-23
          + Status report?
          + See [27]draft, and [28]SW message to CG chairs.
     * [29]IRIEverywhere-27
          + Completed action TB 2003/04/14: Draft a proposed step forward
            on IRI 27. ([30]Done). In that [31]email, TB proposes to
            close this issue.
          + Action CL 2003/04/07: Revised position statement on use of
            IRIs. CL says to expect this by 21 April.
          + Action TBL 2003/04/28: Explain how existing specifications
            that handle IRIs are inconsistent. (Action unclear from 28
            Apr minutes).
     * [32]URIEquivalence-15
          + SW proposal: Track RFC2396bis where [33]Tim Bray text has
            been integrated. Comment within the IETF process. Move this
            issue to pending state.
     * [34]xmlIDSemantics-32
          + See [35]Chris Lilley draft finding. Next steps?
     * [36]siteData-36
          + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
     * [37]xmlFunctions-34
          + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to
            XML Core work. See [38]email from TimBL capturing some of the
     * [39]binaryXML-30
          + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on
            adding to survey.
          + Next steps to finding? See [40]summary from Chris.
     * [41]contentPresentation-26
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space.
            Due 3 March.
     * [42]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
            desideratum ([43]RQ-23).
     * [44]HTTPSubstrate-16
          + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether
            the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended
            to be excluded from RFC 3205
          + See [45]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
     * [46]errorHandling-20
          + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of
            (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3)
            robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error
            has been signaled. Due first week of March.
     * [47]metadataInURI-31
          + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
          + See also [48]TB email on Apple Music Store and use of URI
            schemes instead of headers
     * [49]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
         1. Connection to content negotiation?
         2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
         3. No actions associated / no owner.

     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
     [27] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0094.html
     [28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0104
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
     [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
     [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0090.html
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
     [33] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlIDSemantics-32
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/xmlIDSemantics-32.html
     [36] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
     [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
     [38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0309.html
     [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
     [40] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
     [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
     [43] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
     [44] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
     [45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
     [46] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
     [47] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [48] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0151.html
     [49] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28

3. Other actions

     * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
       actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ and PLH making
       substantial progress on this; hope to have something to show in


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2003/05/01 14:50:05 $

Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2003 10:58:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC