W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2003

RE: [Agenda] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, next arch doc?, tech plenary feedback, issues...)

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:10:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D1881439704CCBF5F@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

We failed to get to this item at today's TAG meeting and I have been
assured that it will be near the top of next week's agenda.  I apologize
for the delay in dealing with your questions.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com]
> Sent: March 13, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: Ian B. Jacobs
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [Agenda] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, next
arch
> doc?, tech plenary feedback, issues...)
> 
> 
> >* [31]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
> >          + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
> >            desideratum ([32]RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh
> >            ([33]forwarded by Paul Cotton).
> 
> I would actually prefer that [33] was dealt with separately since it
is
> effectively a separate request for input from the WS Description WG.
> 
> To give it the visibility it disserves I think it should be discussed
> under New Issues.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> > Sent: March 13, 2003 11:44 AM
> > To: www-tag@w3.org
> > Subject: [Agenda] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, next arch
> doc?,
> > tech plenary feedback, issues...)
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > The agenda of the 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf is available
> > as HTML [1] and as text below.
> >
> >  - Ian
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/17-tag
> >
> > ========================================================
> >
> >                    Agenda for 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference
> >
> >    Nearby: [4]Teleconference details * [5]issues list * [6]www-tag
> >    archive
> >
> >       [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
> >       [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
> >       [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/
> >
> >    Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close
of
> >    business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.
> >
> > 1. Administrative (30min)
> >
> >     1. Confirm Chair, Scribe
> >     2. Accept [7]24 Feb telecon minutes?
> >     3. Accept this [8]agenda?
> >     4. Next meeting: 24 March?
> >
> >       [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/24-tag-summary.html
> >       [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/10-tag.html
> >
> >   1.1 Meeting planning
> >
> >      * May schedule?
> >           + FTF meeting? See [9]thread from SW. Or a two-day
> distributed
> >             meeting?
> >           + Presentation at AC meeting?
> >           + 21 May W3C Track session?
> >      * Proposed 14-15 Nov Japan
> >      * If confirmed, IJ to ask Member calendar to be updated.
> >
> >       [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0003.html
> >
> >   1.2 Mailing list management
> >
> >      * Completed action SW: Send draft mailing list policy to
> tag@w3.org.
> >        (See [10]preliminary announcement and [11]proposed text).
> >      * [12]Proposal from Paul Cotton for announcement list.
> >
> >      [10]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0196.html
> >      [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0053.html
> >      [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0038.html
> >
> >   1.3 Review of input from technical plenary
> >
> >      * Feedback about TAG process?
> >      * Feedback on specific issues?
> >           + xlinkScope-23 and summary of BOF from Tech Plenary; see
> >             [13]BOF report from Henry Thompson
> >
> >      [13] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/03/xlink_bof_report.html
> >
> >   1.4 Other stuff
> >
> >      * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that
> >        actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working
with
> >        PLH on this.
> >
> > 2. Technical (60min)
> >
> >   2.1 Architecture document
> >
> >    See also: [14]findings.
> >     1. [15]21 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc:
> >          1. Resolve to request publication of this draft (with
> >             modifications?) on TR page?
> >          2. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para
> under
> >             2.2.4
> >          3. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and
> >             incorrect application of REST to an actual web page
design
> >          4. Action DO2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web
> >             services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and
> paste
> >             and put into DC writing.
> >          5. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that
> takes
> >             language from internet media type registration, propose
> for
> >             arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from
> >             CP10.
> >          6. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing
> new
> >             protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP.
> DC
> >             suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then
say
> >             "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [16]Proposal
from
> TB
> >             to withdraw the proposal.
> >          7. See [17]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary
> >
> >      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
> >      [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030221
> >      [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005
> >      [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0050.html
> >
> >   2.2 Issues
> >
> >    Note: IETF meets this week; is there anything we would like
> addressed
> >    that could be addressed in that forum?
> >
> >    Prioritization pass?
> >      * [18]xlinkScope-23
> >           + Status report?
> >      * [19]siteData-36
> >           + Completed action TB: Post a [20]strawman proposal for
> >             siteData-36.
> >           + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36
> >      * [21]namespaceDocument-8
> >           + Next steps on [22]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul
Cotton
> >      * [23]xmlFunctions-34
> >           + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference
to
> >             XML Core work. Deadline 17 Feb.
> >      * [24]binaryXML-30
> >           + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts
> on
> >             adding to survey.
> >           + Next steps to finding? See [25]summary from Chris.
> >      * [26]contentPresentation-26
> >           + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this
> space.
> >             Deadline 3 March.
> >
> >      [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23
> >      [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36
> >      [20]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0297.html
> >      [21]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8
> >      [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213
> >      [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34
> >      [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30
> >      [25]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html
> >      [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-
> > summary.html#contentPresentation-26
> >
> >      * [27]URIEquivalence-15
> >           + See [28]draft 4. See also [29]email from Larry Masinter
on
> >             xml namespaces.
> >           + TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to uri@w3.org requesting
> >             terminology change (regarding definition of "URI").
> >           + Completed Action TB 2003/02/06: Send URI equiv draft
> finding
> >             to uri@w3.org. ([30]Done))
> >      * [31]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
> >           + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema
> >             desideratum ([32]RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh
> >             ([33]forwarded by Paul Cotton).
> >      * [34]uriMediaType-9
> >           + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on
> >             discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
> >      * [35]RDFinXHTML-35
> >           + Completed action DC 2003/02/06: Write up a crisp
> articulation
> >             of issue RDFINHTML-35. [36]Done
> >      * [37]HTTPSubstrate-16
> >           + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking
> whether
> >             the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is
> intended
> >             to be excluded from RFC 3205
> >           + See [38]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
> >      * [39]errorHandling-20
> >           + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic
> of
> >             (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early
binding
> (3)
> >             robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once
> error
> >             has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
> >      * [40]IRIEverywhere-27
> >           + Action CL 2003/01/27: Send piece that CL/MD/IJ wrote to
> >             www-tag.
> >      * [41]metadataInURI-31
> >           + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
> >      * [42]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
> >          1. Connection to content negotiation?
> >          2. Connection to opacity of URIs?
> >          3. No actions associated / no owner.
> >      * [43]contentTypeOverride-24
> >           + See [44]email from DC to Voice Browser WG. Does this
> resolve
> >             this issue?
> >
> >      [27]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15
> >      [28] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4.html
> >      [29]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0090.htm
> >      [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Mar/0014.html
> >      [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-
> > summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
> >      [32]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183
> >      [33]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html
> >      [34]
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9
> >      [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#RDFinXHTML-35
> >      [36]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0019.html
> >      [37]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16
> >      [38]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html
> >      [39]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20
> >      [40]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27
> >      [41]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
> >      [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28
> >      [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-
> > summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24
> >      [44]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html
> >
> >   2.3 New Issues?
> >
> >      * [45]message passing, a dual of shared state from Dan Connolly
> >
> >      [45]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >     Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
> >     Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/13 15:41:37 $
> >
> > --
> > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> > Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
> 
Received on Monday, 17 March 2003 17:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:58 UTC