- From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:13:09 -0500
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
>* [31]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema > desideratum ([32]RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh > ([33]forwarded by Paul Cotton). I would actually prefer that [33] was dealt with separately since it is effectively a separate request for input from the WS Description WG. To give it the visibility it disserves I think it should be discussed under New Issues. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian B. Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org] > Sent: March 13, 2003 11:44 AM > To: www-tag@w3.org > Subject: [Agenda] 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, next arch doc?, > tech plenary feedback, issues...) > > > Hello, > > The agenda of the 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconf is available > as HTML [1] and as text below. > > - Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/17-tag > > ======================================================== > > Agenda for 17 Mar 2003 TAG teleconference > > Nearby: [4]Teleconference details * [5]issues list * [6]www-tag > archive > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist > [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/ > > Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of > business (Boston time) Thursday of this week. > > 1. Administrative (30min) > > 1. Confirm Chair, Scribe > 2. Accept [7]24 Feb telecon minutes? > 3. Accept this [8]agenda? > 4. Next meeting: 24 March? > > [7] http://www.w3.org/2003/02/24-tag-summary.html > [8] http://www.w3.org/2003/03/10-tag.html > > 1.1 Meeting planning > > * May schedule? > + FTF meeting? See [9]thread from SW. Or a two-day distributed > meeting? > + Presentation at AC meeting? > + 21 May W3C Track session? > * Proposed 14-15 Nov Japan > * If confirmed, IJ to ask Member calendar to be updated. > > [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0003.html > > 1.2 Mailing list management > > * Completed action SW: Send draft mailing list policy to tag@w3.org. > (See [10]preliminary announcement and [11]proposed text). > * [12]Proposal from Paul Cotton for announcement list. > > [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0196.html > [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0053.html > [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0038.html > > 1.3 Review of input from technical plenary > > * Feedback about TAG process? > * Feedback on specific issues? > + xlinkScope-23 and summary of BOF from Tech Plenary; see > [13]BOF report from Henry Thompson > > [13] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/03/xlink_bof_report.html > > 1.4 Other stuff > > * Action IJ 2003/02/06: Modify issues list to show that > actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with > PLH on this. > > 2. Technical (60min) > > 2.1 Architecture document > > See also: [14]findings. > 1. [15]21 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc: > 1. Resolve to request publication of this draft (with > modifications?) on TR page? > 2. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under > 2.2.4 > 3. Action DC 2003/01/27: write two pages on correct and > incorrect application of REST to an actual web page design > 4. Action DO2003/01/27: Please send writings regarding Web > services to tag@w3.org. DO grants DC license to cut and paste > and put into DC writing. > 5. Action CL 2003/0127: Draft language for arch doc that takes > language from internet media type registration, propose for > arch doc, include sentiment of TB's second sentence from > CP10. > 6. Action TB 2003/01/27: Develop CP11 more: Avoid designing new > protocols if you can accomplish what you want with HTTP. DC > suggested describing GET/PUT/POST in a para each, then say > "if your app looks like that, use HTTP". [16]Proposal from TB > to withdraw the proposal. > 7. See [17]PC's email on feedback from Tech Plenary > > [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings > [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/webarch-20030221 > [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0005 > [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Mar/0050.html > > 2.2 Issues > > Note: IETF meets this week; is there anything we would like addressed > that could be addressed in that forum? > > Prioritization pass? > * [18]xlinkScope-23 > + Status report? > * [19]siteData-36 > + Completed action TB: Post a [20]strawman proposal for > siteData-36. > + Action TBL 2003/02/24 : Summarize siteData-36 > * [21]namespaceDocument-8 > + Next steps on [22]RDDL Proposal from Tim Bray/Paul Cotton > * [23]xmlFunctions-34 > + Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to > XML Core work. Deadline 17 Feb. > * [24]binaryXML-30 > + Action TB 2003/02/17: Write to www-tag with his thoughts on > adding to survey. > + Next steps to finding? See [25]summary from Chris. > * [26]contentPresentation-26 > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. > Deadline 3 March. > > [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#xlinkScope-23 > [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist.html#siteData-36 > [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0297.html > [21] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#namespaceDocument-8 > [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0213 > [23] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#xmlFunctions-34 > [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#binaryXML-30 > [25] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0224.html > [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#contentPresentation-26 > > * [27]URIEquivalence-15 > + See [28]draft 4. See also [29]email from Larry Masinter on > xml namespaces. > + TBL 2003/01/20: Send email to uri@w3.org requesting > terminology change (regarding definition of "URI"). > + Completed Action TB 2003/02/06: Send URI equiv draft finding > to uri@w3.org. ([30]Done)) > * [31]rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema > desideratum ([32]RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh > ([33]forwarded by Paul Cotton). > * [34]uriMediaType-9 > + Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on > discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent > * [35]RDFinXHTML-35 > + Completed action DC 2003/02/06: Write up a crisp articulation > of issue RDFINHTML-35. [36]Done > * [37]HTTPSubstrate-16 > + Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether > the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended > to be excluded from RFC 3205 > + See [38]message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services. > * [39]errorHandling-20 > + Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of > (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3) > robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error > has been signaled. Deadline first week of March. > * [40]IRIEverywhere-27 > + Action CL 2003/01/27: Send piece that CL/MD/IJ wrote to > www-tag. > * [41]metadataInURI-31 > + Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one. > * [42]fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML. > 1. Connection to content negotiation? > 2. Connection to opacity of URIs? > 3. No actions associated / no owner. > * [43]contentTypeOverride-24 > + See [44]email from DC to Voice Browser WG. Does this resolve > this issue? > > [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#URIEquivalence-15 > [28] http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4.html > [29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0090.htm > [30] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2003Mar/0014.html > [31] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6 > [32] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xmlschema-11-req-20030121/#N400183 > [33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0207.html > [34] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#uriMediaType-9 > [35] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#RDFinXHTML-35 > [36] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0019.html > [37] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#HTTPSubstrate-16 > [38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0208.html > [39] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#errorHandling-20 > [40] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#IRIEverywhere-27 > [41] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31 > [42] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#fragmentInXML-28 > [43] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open- > summary.html#contentTypeOverride-24 > [44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Feb/0085.html > > 2.3 New Issues? > > * [45]message passing, a dual of shared state from Dan Connolly > > [45] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Mar/0018.html > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL > Last modified: $Date: 2003/03/13 15:41:37 $ > > -- > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 14:13:30 UTC