- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:56:06 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
/ "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> was heard to say: | Regarding the qnameAsId issue, which is now water over the dam as XSLT/XPath | has become widespread and successful, I would prefer incorporating language | acknowledging XPath's use of qnames, which goes beyond xs:Qname, e.g. Yes, I toyed with some wording on that score but couldn't write anything with which I was happy. I should try again. | "Use of QNames within attribute content may be signalled by a regular | expression defined type such as [ex:QNameTokens]. When used in this fashion, | an implicit or explicit namespace context must exist within which namespace | prefixes are bound to namespace URIs. " I don't see how this text covers XPath. I don't think XPath expressions can be described by any meaningful regular expression. | Ideally the regular expression which is used to define a QName containing | string would have been defined by XML Schema as a builtin type, but this | issue wasn't apparently apparent at the time :-/ I am tempted to suggested adding an XPath data type. I'm not at all comfortable with the monolithic nature of data types in XML Schema, so I'm not sure I want to suggest it there. But there's probably no where else. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM | A man can believe a considerable deal of XML Standards Engineer | rubbish, and yet go about his daily work in a XML Technology Center | rational and cheerful manner.--Norman Douglas Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
Received on Wednesday, 5 June 2002 15:56:39 UTC