- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 09:32:17 -0700
- To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Cc: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote: > > On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 04:39 AM, Williams, Stuart wrote: > >> *If* "nutrition facts and buying information" and "cooking >> instruction" are >> reasonable representations of the same concept/resource... then I >> guess that >> would be fine... but I'm trying to think what the 'super-concept' might be >> that admits representation as "nutrition facts etc." or "cooking >> instructions". > > The concept is a box of cereal I'm saying that these do not feel like reasonable representations of the same resource. I think "nutrition facts" and "cooking instructions" are totally different resources which deserve separate URIs. Consider a future web in which it is routine to have machine-processable versions of resources, how is the machine to decide which representation it wants? -Tikm
Received on Monday, 22 July 2002 12:32:09 UTC