- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:04:41 -0500
- To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Monday, July 22, 2002, at 04:39 AM, Williams, Stuart wrote: > *If* "nutrition facts and buying information" and "cooking instruction" > are > reasonable representations of the same concept/resource... then I guess > that > would be fine... but I'm trying to think what the 'super-concept' might > be > that admits representation as "nutrition facts etc." or "cooking > instructions". The concept is a box of cereal (er... maybe a better example that has cooking instructions and nutirition facts) but the point is that it's a thing, and you get different information about it depending on context. It seems I confused some people by not stating out first that this information were not representations in the HTTP sense, but merely related content that my device brought back to me. I think it's important we keep HTTP terminology separate from URIs and their usage. -- Aaron [http://www.aaronsw.com] 4FAC4838B7D8D13FA6D92EDB4145521E79F0DF4B I'll be at the O'Reilly Open Source Convention in San Diego July 24-26.
Received on Monday, 22 July 2002 11:04:44 UTC