- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 11:15:03 -0700
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Graham Klyne wrote: >> My own view of what a resource is may be found in >> http://www.textuality.com/tag/s1.1.html > > Looking at that reference: what does it mean for representations to be > "equivalent"? That's a good point, and probably worth saying more about. The equivalence clearly cannot be absolute - the representation of a resource you use for printing and the representation for a PDA are going to differ not only in their appearance but in their content. On the other hand, there is a strong architectural expectation that multiple representations of a resource be *consistent*, and in fact equivalent within the limits set by time, place, identity, and capability. -Tim
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 16:29:46 UTC