RE: httpRange-14 , what's the problem from Joshua Allen on 2002-07-18 (www-tag@w3.org from July 2002)

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 20:51:28 -0700
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "www-tag" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C105DCD4B6@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> > http is UNLIMITED.  Everyone agrees that http: identifiers *could*
be
> > used for everything.  It's the *should* part that people are arguing
> > about.
> 
> Then the argument is a waste of time anyway, since it doesn't prevent
> RDF from having to deal with those resources that are not documents.

Please clarify:  I think you meant to say "RDF must have the capability
to disambiguate, and if it has the capability to disambiguate, there is
no problem with people using http: URI to identify a car".

Is that correct?

Received on Wednesday, 17 July 2002 23:52:00 UTC