- From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 13:44:37 +0100
- To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net>
- Cc: "'www-tag'" <www-tag@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@prescod.net] > > Are you saying that there is no problem or that the problem > lies with the Web and URIs, not RDF? Paul, I'm saying that when you decide how you want to name representations using URIs, RDF should play well with that decision, irregardless of the scheme employed. One problem, and it is only a problem as opposed to the sky falling in, is, if you use the same URI to denote the resource and the representation, then RDF as it stands today won't know which one you're talking about. Otherwise from where I'm standing the Web and URIs have precious few problems considering what they give us; technologies like RDDL only make things better. Bill de hÓra .. Propylon www.propylon.com
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 08:45:36 UTC