Bill de hÓra wrote: > > .... > > Paul, > > To do that you require a URI to name that representation. That will be a > distinct URI from the resource in question. How we decide to name > representations is a policy matter, and has nothing to do with RDF. RDF > will work fine with representations that are 'lifted' into resources. > That you have a naming explosion, or that thinking about a Web where > representations are resources might seem odd, is incidental to RDF. Are you saying that there is no problem or that the problem lies with the Web and URIs, not RDF? -- Come discuss XML and REST web services at: Open Source Conference: July 22-26, 2002, conferences.oreillynet.com Extreme Markup: Aug 4-9, 2002, www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 08:31:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:52 UTC