Stuart, you may be interested in Hugo's review[1,2] of SOAP 1.2. Jean-Jacques. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0019.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Jul/0020.html "Ian B. Jacobs" wrote: > ------------------------------------------ > 2.1 Review SOAP in last call? > ------------------------------------------ > > SW: The XMLP WG has asked the TAG whether they will > review the SOAP 1.0 specification in last call. > > RF, SW: SOAP 1.2 is not sufficiently architectural in > scope (in the way the CharMod spec was). > > Resolved: The TAG does not intend to commit to a > complete review of the last call document. The XMLP WG > should indicate whether there is a particular issue > having architectural scope they want us to look at. > > Action SW: Respond to XMLP WG on behalf of TAG.Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 04:29:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:52 UTC