W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2002

Draft TAG response to as yet unnumbered Rick Jelliffe issue

From: David Orchard <david.orchard@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:04:09 -0800
To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <02a501c1b44b$df5fa9e0$6b0ba8c0@beasys.com>
My draft response.  I note that the i18n IG is a Member list, which seems
strange to me.


In [1], you asked the TAG to give guidance to the XML Core WG on XML 1.1 wrt
XML in the web architecture.  At this time, the Core Group has issued a
reasoned call for assistance on issues wrt XML 1.1 [2].  At this time, the
TAG believes the Core group's response is sufficient and hence we close the
issue from a TAG perspective.  When an issue is closed by the TAG with the
TAG suggesting that another group's response should lead to a reasonable
resolution, you may reraise the issue should the resolution prove
insufficient.  We do not track the progress of closed issues.

Dave Orchard on behalf of the W3C TAG.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Feb/0054.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2002Feb/0014.html
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 00:08:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:55:49 UTC