Draft agenda of meeting 8 April

This is an early mailing of the proposed agenda.
Thanks Ian for drawing it up.   Discussion (focussed!)  of these issues
on this list before the meeting is of course a good idea.
As usual, minor changes may be made or links added to the
web page before the meeting, but no after close of business Thursday.

               Draft agenda for 8 April 2002 TAG teleconference

     * Previous meeting 1 April ([1]agenda, [2]meeting summary)
     * [3]This meeting IRC
     * Next meeting: 15 April teleconf

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/25-tag
      [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary
      [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/08-tagmem-irc.html

   Nearby: [4]TAG home  [5]teleconference details  [6]issues list 
   [7]mailing list threads

      [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
      [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
      [6] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist
      [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/2001/tag/threads

   Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of
   business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.


    1. Read documents/revisions that should be ready before end of this
          + @@Findings on uriMediaType-9@@ (DC, SW)
          + [8]Three points for TAG presentation to AC in May 2002 (TBL)
          + @@Draft on considering two URI variants to be equivalent@@
          + @@Suggestions for namespace documents@@ (SW)
          + @@Critique of RFC3205@@ (RF)
          + Read [9]Architecture from 50K feet with regards to forms,
            GET, and POST

      [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Apr/0002.html
      [9] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture

Administrative stuff (15min)

    1. Accept [10]previous minutes?
    2. Accept this agenda?
    3. Accept state of [11]action items?
    4. Top-three topics for TAG presentation at AC meeting? See
       [12]suggestions from TBL.
    5. Mailing list policies:
          + How to keep messages on www-tag focused? Should we be asking
            www-tag to concentrate on issues TAG is addressing, or should
            list be open to all discussion? If so, how do we allow TAG
            participants to focus?
          + Should we have a second public list that is public-readable
            and TAG-writable? Would two lists not solve any problem or
            allow TAG participants facilitate focused public discussion?

     [10] http://www.w3.org/2002/03/25-tag-summary
     [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Apr/0002.html

Technical (70min)

    1. Review revised [13]findings on uriMediaType-9.
    2. Is there consensus that GET should be used for form actions that
       do not have side effects, and POST for those that do?
       Preparation: read [14]Architecture from 50K feet.
    3. Discuss issue of scope of TAG/W3C/Web Architecture (@@see TB
       Action below@@).

     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/01-uriMediaType-9
     [14] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture

  For discussion at upcoming meetings

    1. 8 April: Discussion of [15]integration of 5 one-page summaries:
         1. [16]Intro: TB, DC, input from CL
         2. [17]What does a URI identify?: NW and SW
         3. [18]What does a document mean?: NW and SW
         4. [19]One-page REST summary: RF and DO
         5. [20]Notes on "what a message means": CL

     [15] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0330-intro
     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/intro
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/identify.html
     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/docmeaning.html
     [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Mar/0023.html
     [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Mar/0022.html

Recent action items

   Topic Assigned to Assigned at Due date

   Status as of mtg
   Write text about "Web as information space", to be integrated by IJ DO

   Subsumed by Ian Intro?
   Integrate/combine one-page summaries IJ

     [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Mar/0063.html

   3 Apr Started
   Draft three points for TAG presentation to AC in May 2002 TBL
   [23]2002/03/25 5 Apr [24]Done
   Revise [25]findings on uriMediaType-9, incorporating 25 Mar discussion
   points. DC, SW [26]2002/03/25 5 Apr
   Take question of HTTP Query to W3C/IETF liaison ([27]issue
   whenToUseGet-7) TBL [28]2002/02/12 8 Apr Sent mail; awaiting ack.
   Extract issues for TAG from [29]thread on boundaries for the Web TB
   [30]2002/03/25 27 Mar
   Add URIEquivalence-15 and HTTPSubstrate-16 to issues list IJ
   [31]2002/04/01 8 Apr Done
   Write draft on when URI variants are considered equivalent
   (URIEquivalence-15) TBL [32]2002/04/01 4 Apr
   Find someone in W3C Team or RDF world to draft comments on RDF+HTML
   for namespace documents TBL, IJ [33]2002/04/01 8 Apr
   Draft suggestions for namespace documents SW [34]2002/04/01 4 Apr
   Start discussion on www-tag about criticism of RFC3025
   (HTTPSubstrate-16) RF [35]2002/04/01 8 Apr

     [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Mar/0063.html
     [23] http://www.w3.org/2002/03/25-tag-summary.html
     [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2002Apr/0002.html
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/01-uriMediaType-9
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2002/03/25-tag-summary.html
     [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#whenToUseGet-7
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2002/02/12-tagmem-irc#T22-25-37
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2002/03/25-tag-summary
     [31] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary
     [32] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary
     [33] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary
     [34] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary
     [35] http://www.w3.org/2002/04/01-tag-summary


    Ian Jacobs, for TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2002/04/01 20:48:00 $

Received on Monday, 1 April 2002 16:27:35 UTC