- From: Anthony Grasso <Anthony.Grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:50:35 +0000
- To: W3C SVG Comments List <www-svg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html
---
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
SVG Working Group Teleconference
16 Feb 2011
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/0142.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-irc
Attendees
Present
Doug_Schepers, anthony_work, [IPcaller], ed, heycam, ChrisL,
tbah, adrianba
Regrets
Chair
Cameron
Scribe
anthony
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Face-to-face
2. [6]Status update on SVG 1.1 2nd Edition
3. [7]SVG in HTML
4. [8]Marker and Colour
5. [9]Review of Progress Events
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 16 February 2011
<scribe> Scribe: anthony
<scribe> ScribeNick: anthony
Face-to-face
CM: Today's telcon will probably the last before the face-to-face
... people may be travelling next week
<heycam>
[11]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/F2F/Auckland_2011/Agenda
[11] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/F2F/Auckland_2011/Agenda
CM: so we will cancel next weeks
... wanted to check if people had noticed anything missing from the
agenda
DS: Did you get confirmation from Dean that he can come?
CM: I got confirmation that he can't come
... he's stuck in the USA
... for another week
... Dean said he was thinking about some APIs for some Animation
... and he may send it through
ED: About the Animations
... if there are questions and topics, I can forward those to people
in Opera
CM: I plan to start hashing out some Animation stuff on the Wiki
DS: Brian will be there right?
CM: Yes, he'll stick some stuff up on that page
... he's going to be focusing on fixing SMIL stuff in SVG rather
than harmonisation
DS: Not going to be there on Monday until noon
CM: Fujisawa-san is going to be there Monday - Wednesday
... and Alex Danilo will be there Wednesday - Friday
... If you have time to stick stuff up on the Wiki please do so by
Monday
CL: I think it's really good that the chairs are doing this work
prior to the meeting
ED: I think it will help to get the agenda sorted out before the
meeting starts
CM: I think we will discuss that over the next few days
... if there is anything that we've missed, stick it up and let us
know
Status update on SVG 1.1 2nd Edition
CM: For my part I haven't been able to find any time
... to fix Batik up for any test failures
... I started looking at one
... there are 19 tests that are marked as less than two passes
... a few telcons ago we assigned actions to people asked them to
look at their implementations
... not sure if that is all we needed to do
ED: I haven't had time to look at the actions I took for that
... I do know we have a couple of those failing tests in internal
builds
CM: I can't really guarantee that I'll have stuff fixed before the
face-to-face
DS: My take on this less than two passes is it isn't supported well
... and we shouldn't include it
CM: Do we remove the feature then?
CL: One option is to say it is not defined
... there is also a class of things that we are saying are defined
but we don't test
... in CSS is that is
DS: There are a lot of things that are good in the spec that are not
implemented
... and we can resolve some of these things in SVG 2
... so we could change 'must' to 'should'
... but it's a lot of trouble
... I think it would take a lot of work to do
... we can do that in the frame of SVG 2
... even though I don't like the idea of features untested
CM: I feel like we've gone that set of tests to determine if we can
get passes on them
... but we haven't decided if we would drop them
... I get the feeling that it's going to be pretty hard to get those
done as fix ups
... If we want to get things done by the face-to-face not sure if we
will have time
... Should we leave deciding what to do with the test to the
face-to-face?
CL: If it's something that we can fix in SVG 2 then we can leave it
until then
... then if it is something fundamental to the specification
... then we should push implementations to fix it
CM: That's what worries me the most
... is features not being implemented
... that are important
... it could be one of those case that it is a bit tricky and
provides marginal value
DS: I think we should keep in mind that once we complete SVG 1.1 2nd
edition
... doesn't mean that we won't make a 3rd edition
... so if we think there is the slightest ambiguity about a test
... we should mark it for SVG 1.1 3rd edition or SVG
... 2
ED: We could mark the parts of tests that are not passing
... I had a couple of actions to do that
... but it doesn't cover all of the tests remaining
DS: Historically going through tests during the face-to-face
... is time consuming
... and we have a pretty full agenda
... we should try to talk about this over email
CL: I think we should have a Wiki page with the tests
... and have reasons for dropping certain tests
CM: I will create a page after the call
... and put my initial opinions up
... and we'll see what comes out of that
<scribe> ACTION: Cameron to Create a Wiki page listing the current
tests that have less that 2 passes in SVG 1.1 2nd edition [recorded
in [12]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2960 - Create a Wiki page listing the
current tests that have less that 2 passes in SVG 1.1 2nd edition
[on Cameron McCormack - due 2011-02-23].
<tbah> [13]http://tavmjong.free.fr/SVG/BUTTON_TEST/button_test.xhtml
[13] http://tavmjong.free.fr/SVG/BUTTON_TEST/button_test.xhtml
SVG in HTML
TB: I tried to test 'seamless' attribute
... I verified that the SMIL works inside an image
... I guess my conclusion from all this is that it is more tricky
... than I thought
... If you're trying to use more than one button
... it becomes more difficult
ED: Could use window.frameElement
CM: Could use that to write your script in SVG
... One interesting thing you raised was the even propagation
... and I don't think it's defined anywhere specifically
... I'd be interested to see what happens in another document
... with iFrame
TB: It doesn't
... in my page I put a dummy document and tried it
... for IE9 it works for both
CM: That sounds like a general issues that needs to go into DOM
events
... so I guess what might be good that comes out of these tests is
concrete things that are unresolved
... apart from that one you had the marker one
<ChrisL> tpic: markers and color
Marker and Colour
CL: currentColor on a given taken element takes the color on a given
element and uses it
... What you're saying is over here I have a marker defined
... and over here I have a path defined
<ChrisL> tav we lost you
<tbah> i'll be bach in a sec
TB: Suppose that your marker is defined there is nothing that gives
you what the colour is
DS: I think Tav one thing to do is make a proposal for specific
mechanisms. Why don't you write up some
... spec text
... and we can reviewed that
... I think we all agree that we want the spec to do something
useful for markers and colours
... If you find a away and is unlikely to conflict with current
implementations then that would be useful
<scribe> ACTION: Tavmjong to Propose text to address issue with
marker colours not matching colours of path [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2961 - Propose text to address issue with
marker colours not matching colours of path [on Tavmjong Bah - due
2011-02-23].
TB: I liked the idea Patrick suggested in Paris
Review of Progress Events
<ed>
[15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/014
6.html
[15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/0146.html
CL: There was a spec that SVG was doing that was about MAE
... is this a replacement spec?
ED: I think we defined progress events in Tiny 1.2 spec
... so it's not MAE
<ed>
[16]http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/svgudom.html#events__ProgressEven
t
[16] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/svgudom.html#events__ProgressEvent
Adrian: Progress events spec is used in a number of different places
... it ensures that things a consistent no matter where it is used
ED: Sent one minor comment about the spec
... just wondering if there is a set of those events that could be
made normative
DS: Does it say they are not normative?
ED: Yes
Adrian: I think it's to do with the naming
DS: This is a spec that defines a model rather than a set of events
Adrian: You shouldn't expect to see tests on this spec
... because this spec is used by others
CL: For SVG 2 would we have to import these and change the names?
Adrian: I think so
CL: Would you be willing to collect the comments for this spec and
send them on?
ED: Ok
CM: So everyone agrees that next week telcon is cancelled
trackbot, end telcon
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Cameron to Create a Wiki page listing the current
tests that have less that 2 passes in SVG 1.1 2nd edition [recorded
in [17]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Tavmjong to Propose text to address issue with marker
colours not matching colours of path [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html#action02]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [19]scribe.perl version 1.135
([20]CVS log)
$Date: 2011/02/16 20:39:33 $
_________________________________________________________
[19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[20] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Scribe.perl diagnostic output
[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20
Check for newer version at [21]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002
/scribe/
[21] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/w/2/
Succeeded: s/doesn't mean that we will make a 3rd edition/doesn't mean
that we won't make a 3rd edition/
Succeeded: s/seemless/seamless/
Succeeded: s/framelement/window.frameElement/
Succeeded: s/TB: What/CL: What/
Found Scribe: anthony
Inferring ScribeNick: anthony
Found ScribeNick: anthony
Default Present: Doug_Schepers, anthony_work, [IPcaller], ed, heycam, C
hrisL, tbah, adrianba
Present: Doug_Schepers anthony_work [IPcaller] ed heycam ChrisL tbah ad
rianba
Agenda: [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMa
r/0142.html
Found Date: 16 Feb 2011
Guessing minutes URL: [23]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html
People with action items: cameron tavmjong
[22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2011JanMar/0142.html
[23] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/16-svg-minutes.html
End of [24]scribe.perl diagnostic output]
[24] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.
Received on Wednesday, 16 February 2011 20:51:15 UTC