- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:17:12 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hello, this old CSS draft still has some funny proposals in it, not useful for SVG and not useful for CSS-animation and -transforms as well. For example for the angle type is noted: "Angle values should be normalized to the range 0-360deg by the user agent. For example, -10deg and 350deg are equivalent." If authors want to have an animation with more than one turn or in a defined direction from a negative to a positive angle or vice versa this results in nonsense. Open question: What happens for an animation from 0 to 360deg? Therefore I think, this old draft is quite useful for a CSS world without animation, but not for CSS with animation or for SVG. It needs a careful update. Other problems may occur with numbers in scientific notation or the different approach for lengths and units for example. Such an update of the CSS draft would be a good chance to adjust it to the SVG recommendations ... Olaf
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 10:38:29 UTC