- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:25:31 +0100
- To: www-svg List <www-svg@w3.org>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Labelling SVG files: publishing updated Accessibility Guidelines Chris & Doug, Does anyone have what they consider to be an exemplary or even good example of how SVG should be labelled to help people using non-visual technologies as well as search engines comprehend content of SVG files? this includes future-proofing them, for when assistive technologies and indexing improve. How about a statement describing the same? http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG-access/#def-eq-alt does not provide examples of good practice. This statement is part of a w3c 'Note" from 2000, when will the new Accessibility Guidelines be published? cheers Jonathan Chetwynd Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet I recently raised accessibility concerns in the SW group concerning their ~20 new SVG logos. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Oct/0092.html I then subsequently discovered that all my new weather symbols on wikipedia are also missing internal descriptions of their content, though google does rank them by their filenames, this is not good enough. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Weather_symbols
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 08:25:55 UTC