- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:45:23 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:26:43 +0200, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org> wrote: > But you're ignoring the fact that FF is more strict about namespaces > than ASV! It also requires an XLink namespace declaration, in addition > to the attribute prefix. So, really, over 90% of the browser market > share is composed of UAs that require the 'xlink:' prefix (directly or > indirectly). Maybe FF could change, but we're not hearing from any > decision-makers there about this issue, yet; they are pretty strict with > XML, so I'd be interested to hear their take. So you're suggesting we should consider breaking conformance with Namespaces in XML 1.0? I don't think that's a good idea. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 09:45:40 UTC