- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:07:18 +0200
- To: <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
* Doug Schepers wrote: >The SVG WG has discussed navigation mechanisms and syntax with the CSS, >HTML, WAI, and DI WGs at the Technical Plenary in March, and found common >ground to move forward. The SVG WG habegun the process toward a further >liaison to these groups (and now including XForms) with the goal of >establishing a joint resolution for unified syntax that meets the >requirements of all of these groups. We have proposed a joint telcon with a >specific agenda on settling these issues in a timely manner. > >In the meantime, the SVG WG believes that it has done due diligence in >merging the best of all worlds to arrive at its current navigation >specification, and thus we will go forward with the current draft, pending >the results of our joint work with the other WGs. > >If this does not satisfy your concern, please respond promptly. While interesting, the progress report certainly does not satisfy me; twe Working Group agreed twice with me request, if the Working Group disagrees now, it'll have to provide technically sound rationale for the decision. If it is unknown whether the Working Group still agrees due to pending technical work, the Working Group will have to come back to me some time between completing the technical work and the request to advance the document to Candidate Recommendation. Without further information from the Working Group I certainly cannot agree with the current design for reasons I've already provided in this thread. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 00:07:33 UTC