Re: [SVG 1.2] 7 multimedia

On 15 nov. 03, at 17:14, Jim Ley wrote:

>> As far I understand, <video> is a "subclass" of <image>, and it should
>> just not render.
> I will certainly raise an issue against this, video, like images have 
> a size
> and they should be consistent with the behaviour of including an SVG 
> image
> defined the same.  It should render.

Huh? <image> does not render for 0 value width and/or height. Or did 
you mean something else? And please, don't raise your guns with issues 
right away, constructuve feedback like you send is sufficient for us to 
take notice and make for a more gentle exchange. It's just a draft.

Antoine Quint <>
W3C SVG Working Group Invited Expert
SVG Consulting, Teaching and Outsourcing
Fuchsia Design <>

Received on Saturday, 15 November 2003 11:28:40 UTC