Re: SVG 1.2 12.1.1 The Progress Event

Jim Ley wrote:
> "Thomas E Deweese" <thomas.deweese@kodak.com>
>>>>>>>"JL" == Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> writes:
>>JL> "Dean Jackson" <dean@w3.org>
>>    This is an attractive answer but goes against what has been
>>happening for 404's on images since HTML started being used on the
>>web.  It would clearly be easier for servers to generate SVG 404's
>>than say 'JPEG' 404 - but I still doubt it's likely to happen :)
> 
> I can't believe I'm unique in serving up 404 jpegs!

You're not, but I think it's mostly the two of us quite frankly.

> (there's a similar situation with HTTP 302/307 status
> which RFC 2616 says "The entity of the response SHOULD contain a short
> hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s)" - but doesn't suggest
> what mark-up language I should use for that note.)

Well, that's an easy one, just use XLink, it'll be understood irrespective of 
the vocabulary!

/me ducks in case some XHTML people are lurking

-- 
Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Research Engineer, Expway        http://expway.fr/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE  8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 08:51:16 UTC