- From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 04:26:53 -0800
- To: "'Jon Ferraiolo'" <jferraio@Adobe.COM>
- Cc: <xml-dev@xml.org>, <www-svg@w3.org>, "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Jon Ferraiolo wrote: >As I remember, we decided against a syntax with coordinates as >character data because we wanted character data only for things >that were textual in nature (such as <text> elements). Now this is interesting. Do you recall WHY the WG wanted to use character data only for things that were textual in nature? I am not being critical here. I just sense a gem of wisdom I do not yet have. I am intrigued. >These comments have been made in the desire to be candid and >truthful about what is likely to happen. Would you prefer instead >that I set up expectations incorrectly, or perhaps that the >comments were left unanswered? No. I am not placing the blame on you. I am disappointed with the likely turn of events you are predicting. Your responses are appreciated still. >I do not recall any feedback comments to the first last call about >the 'path' element. I accept my share of the blame. Like everyone else, I was (and am) under an endless avalanche of specs to read. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2000 07:25:19 UTC