Re: [css-writing-modes] Can't analyze a passage and find it redundantly technical

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:10:16 -0800
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
 
> Replaced elements have a very specific technical meaning in CSS,
> and this paragraph is addressing those. It lists a number of
> examples to make sure that readers understand the full extent of
> its implications. Your rewrite is less precise, and therefore,
> not appropriate for the specification. You are welcome to write
> tutorials and articles about writing mode with less precision :)
> but we cannot afford to do so here.
> 
> ~fantasai
> CSS Writing Modes specification editor
> 

I scanned the document. Only in the reference I found a link. Could
you please turn the respective terms in the document into links to the
below address:

https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/conform.html#replaced-element

Still don't understand the neccessity for the px! Is too high for me!

Still find that the term might be understandable from a very internal
and bottom-up view. However, who is reading this term the first time
can not make any sense of it! Try to choose self-explanatory terms!

Regards,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Heuer
einz@verschwendbare-verweise.seinswende.de

Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 01:37:53 UTC