- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 18:55:49 -0500
- To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Cc: Momdo Nakamura <xmomdo@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/02/2017 02:10 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: > Hi fantasai et al., > > I see the following issues: > > - the problem statement below indicates "[over/under/left/right] is > redundant and painful for authors". Doesn't 'before' > and 'after' solve this issue since they automatically take into > account writing direction? 'over' and 'under' also take into account the 'writing-mode', except they do so in a way that handles Mongolian better. > - TTML2 defines the 'auto' and 'outside' keywords, which, presumably, > have been found to be useful, but are not included in CSS > text-emphasis-position. Does CSS WG believe these keywords are not > useful and/or harmful? The case of "only two lines" isn't really a significant consideration in CSS-based documents. :) I think it's fine for TTML to have 'outside', it makes more sense for their use case. I would probably suggest not using TTML-only behavior as the default, though. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:56:24 UTC