- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:10:15 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Momdo Nakamura <xmomdo@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Hi fantasai et al., I see the following issues: - the problem statement below indicates "[over/under/left/right] is redundant and painful for authors". Doesn't 'before' and 'after' solve this issue since they automatically take into account writing direction? - TTML2 defines the 'auto' and 'outside' keywords, which, presumably, have been found to be useful, but are not included in CSS text-emphasis-position. Does CSS WG believe these keywords are not useful and/or harmful? Apologies for not being more explicit. Best, -- Pierre On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:25 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/02/2017 01:01 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Have you considered the proposed emphasis positions specified in TTML2 WD? >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/ttml2/#style-value-emphasis-position >> >> 'before' and 'after' are used instead of combinations of 'over', >> 'under', 'left' and 'right'. In addition, the 'outside' keyword is >> defined. >> >> It would be good to keep CSS and TTML aligned, as they have been in the >> past. > > > I think you should file that issue against TTML2. > Its earliest working draft is two years later than the Candidate > Recommendation of CSS Text Decoration Level 3. > https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-text-decor-3-20130801/ > https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-ttml2-20150212/ > > ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 2 February 2017 19:11:39 UTC