- From: Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:21:29 -0700
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote: > > (Bcc'd public-css-testsuite and public-test-infra; this pertains to a > CSS WG proposed resolution and hence we should keep discussion on the > CSS WG's public mailing list.) > > The proposed resolution is to merge csswg-test into > web-platform-tests, doing the following: > > 1. Land https://github.com/w3c/wpt-tools/pull/90 into wpt-tools so > that the web-platform-tests tools create an accurate manifest (i.e., > list of tests) for the CSS testsuite. > > 2. Add a number of lints to wpt-tools, for the (currently > non-existent) css subdirectory, to ensure that the build system keeps > working (primarily we need lints to ensure that we have no duplicate > file-extensionless-basenames that aren't byte-for-byte identical and > that all files referenced by test files are in an adjacent support or > reference directory, with a couple of exceptions). Note that while support files need to be in an adjacent ‘support/‘ directory, reference files do not, the build system will adjust paths to reference files so long as the relative urls are correct. > > 3. Ensure web-platform-tests's documentation is up-to-date and > cohesive, both for submitting tests and reviewing them. Especially > make sure it's easier to find documentation than it is currently! > > 4. Make https://hg.csswg.org/test/ and http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/ > read-only. (Really this can be any step up until this point; exact > timing doesn't matter.) > > 5. Merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests, in a css/ subdirectory, > maintaining all csswg-test history. (Do we want to copy w3ctestlib and > apiclient into it as well, given they currently live in Mercurial, and > are needed to build?) apiclient already has a GitHub mirror: https://github.com/plinss/apiclient I can make a GitHub mirror for w3ctestlib too. I recommend we leave these separate (at least apiclient, as it’s used in other projects, like Bikeshed) > > 6. Move over, at the very least, all open issues and PRs from the > csswg-test repository. > > 7. (Sometime in the more distant future) drop the current build system > and the lints we had for its requirements. > > I believe Alan's opinion was to give people a week to respond on the > mailing list and then potentially have a final call for objections (or > discussion!) on the next telecon (5 Oct). I'll let the chairs to say > what they want to do, though. :) > > /Geoffrey. >
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 23:21:57 UTC