- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:33:49 +0100
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote: > As of today, posting mostly so this is written up somewhere prior to TPAC: > > * Almost possible to build a manifest, giving a list of all test > files, using web-platform-test tools. The largest part of the diff > compared with what the CSS Testsuite build system outputs is caused > by tests that do not link to a specification anchor that Shepherd > knows about, which the web-platform-test tools care nothing for. That's 264 tests that are excluded on that basis. > * The CSS Testsuite build system is, once that has landed, only > needed for the CSS Test Harness. Given the status quo is many of > the restrictions required by the build system are oft forgotten or > otherwise neglected (we have no broken links in the unbuilt tests, > but a reasonable number in the built tests), it would be nice to > drop the requirement from the CSS Test Harness or replace it > (discussion on Friday; what do we need from it?). 202 files (some tests, some refs) have broken links in them in the build testsuite. Though some of these are broken <link rel=author> links where they've been partly obfuscated to avoid spam bots picking them up. "foo[at]bar.com" does not a URL make, and hence it breaks. I don't know whether we should just unobfuscate these as well as adding mailto: to them, or just add mailto: to them and leave them as invalid within the mailto scheme. /gsnedders
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 14:34:23 UTC