- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:02:37 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, WHAT Working Group <whatwg@whatwg.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 02:54:56 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> On 9/20/16 1:46 AM, Mats Palmgren wrote: >>> >>> Assuming that the above are the final DOM trees, then they should >>> create exactly the same CSS boxes as if the <div> element is replaced >>> by its (DOM) children. >> >> >> That contradicts what fantasai claimed the spec says. >> >> Which brings me back to my claim that the spec is not clear enough: one of >> you two is wrong, which isn't really a situation that should arise with a >> clear spec. > > I have tried to clarify this in https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/1799. Looks like it's clarified now - the CSS side of things was very clear, it was HTML that wasn't clear about which "child" concept it was using. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 14:03:27 UTC