W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2016

[css-tables-3] Overconstrained fixed table layout: tests and questions

From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:19:43 -0400
To: Francois Remy <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
Cc: W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d9db6369be970555470789ba5247eb64@gtalbot.org>
Greg, François,

Just in case you are not aware of this.

[CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0093.html

Re: [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0094.html

Re: [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0189.html

Can the computed width of a cell be negative and, if so, what would that 
imply overall? Or is this question outside the realm of the CSS3 table 
spec?

- - - - - -

http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/border-spacing-percentage-cell-001.html
How wide should be the navy rectangle: 200px or 400px?

IE11: 200px
Firefox 48: 400px
Chrome 53: 200px
Edge: 200px
Opera 12.16: 200px

Gérard
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 02:20:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:04 UTC