W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2016

Re: PROPOSED RESOLUTION: merge csswg-test into web-platform-tests

From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 02:38:59 +0900
Message-ID: <CAN9ydbWn69n1CoJ_y_R-G-i+_8+vfERXc8kVu1noyvSDDksq8Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
Cc: GĂ©rard Talbot <css21testsuite@gtalbot.org>, Public www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
I agree with you in general, but as we try to move Writing Modes to PR/REC,
Gecko and Blink have 100% test coverages for this test suite, we keep them
up-to-date whenever tests were added/updated, and I need this view[1] to
track our progress and status. Flexbox[2] has quite good test coverage too.

What is rough time frame in your mind to make csswg-test read-only, and to
have the better replacement for the test results? If the replacement of the
results view comes earlier than read-only, or if the read-only is after
Writing Modes REC, I'm fine.

[2] http://test.csswg.org/harness/results/css-flexbox-1_dev/grouped/


2016-09-30 23:43 GMT+09:00 Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>:

> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can you share the plan for http://test.csswg.org/harness/ ? I'm
> currently
> > relying on its test runner and test results. Would it switch to wpt when
> the
> > merge occurs?
> Pretty much the entire reason to keep the build system working at this
> point is to keep the test harness working, at least until we have
> better replacement for it for the entirety of web-platform-tests. (I
> don't expect we'll start getting results from browser's CI systems
> until we move over to the replacement; so, results will remain
> somewhat spotty, depending on what people submit, until then.)
> /gsnedders
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 17:39:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:15:01 UTC