- From: Mats Palmgren <mats@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 21:19:35 +0100
- To: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>, www-style@w3.org
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, Tab Atkins jr <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Sergio Villar Senin <svillar@igalia.com>, Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
On 11/21/2016 05:41 PM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > 1) Alignment and shipment > So it seems their current plan is to ship the whole thing. We shared our plans and reasoning about that, on this list, long before our intent-to-ship: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0011.html IIUC, you're now implementing baseline alignment in Chrome too so I don't understand what the fuss is about here... > 2) Implied minimum size of grid items Frankly, it seems a tad late to make spec changes in these areas now that the Grid spec is in CR, and after two implementors have sent an Intent-to-ship. As far as I know, Firefox is implementing what the specs say regarding Implied Minimum Size and clamping/stretching, including the ratio-preserving stretching for 'normal' that the CSSWG resolved here: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Oct/0068.html (that's not in any spec yet, but that's just a formality IMO) Can you clarify what spec changes you're suggesting *exactly*? > 3) Baseline alignment > Firefox has already implemented baseline alignment a while ago, Yes, but note that we also have a few bugs in baseline alignment. We intend to fix those before release. /Mats
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 20:20:11 UTC