- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:52:38 -0700
- To: "Eric A. Meyer" <eric@meyerweb.com>
- Cc: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Eric A. Meyer <eric@meyerweb.com> wrote: > On 23 May 2016, at 14:29, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> >> wrote: >> >>> * We are making subgrid behavior contingent on there not being >>> any grid-template-* declarations, rather than merely ignoring >>> them, with the hope that authors will not leave any such >>> declarations lying around. Our goal is to allow for more >>> sophisticated interleaving of subgrid and parent grid lines >>> (e.g. 1-axis subgrids) using these properties. This may or may >>> not work out as planned. :) >> >> >> And in further discussion with dholbert, we decided *not* to do this - >> the upgrade story is *way* too uncertain to rely on, so there's not a >> good reason to try out carve out syntax. If we do 1-axis subgrid in >> the future, we'll do so via a different 'display' value, or another >> property, or something else new like that. > > Are you thinking something like 'display: subgrid-col' and 'display: > subgrid-row' to achieve that 1-axis behavior? Not trying to pin you down to > exact syntax or values or even patterns, but I'd like to get a sense of the > thinking here. Yes, something like that. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 19:53:26 UTC