Agreed. On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:36 AM Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On May 18, 2016, at 2:49 AM, Jihye Hong <jh.hong@lge.com> wrote: > > > > We need 'motion-origin'(which will be changed to 'offset-anchor') > separately from 'transform-origin'. > > 'motion-origin' is required not only for rotating the element. It's also > for setting the origin point in the element's > > content area which is placed at different positions along the motion > path. > > I know we were conflating the two needs in the meeting, but I think > setting the origin point of the rotation needs to be separate from setting > the reference point (offset-origin) for aligning to the offset-position in > the containing block. 'offset-origin:auto’ would mean that > 'offset-position:100% 100%’ puts the reference point in the lower right > corner (a la background-position), but this should not affect where the > origin of the rotation should be, which might need to be somewhere else. > -- Curator of Web Animation Weekly Speaking & Workshops • Apr 05 –06 SmashingConf, San Francisco • Apr 21 Frontend Masters, online, CSS Animations and Transitions Master Class • May 18 –20 Front-Trends Keynote, Warsaw • Jun 01 CSSconf Nordic, Oslo
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 09:18:48 UTC