- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 16:39:35 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/13/2016 09:52 AM, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > > > On 12/05/16 17:52, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: >> a recent change [1] in the spec makes flex sizes invalid >> on the min slot of minmax(): >> " <track-size> = >> <track-breadth> | >> minmax( <inflexible-breadth> , <track-breadth> )" >> >> However, the text defining minmax() hasn't been updated [2]: >> "As a maximum, a <flex> value sets the track’s flex factor. >> As a minimum, it is treated as zero (or min-content, >> if the grid container is sized under a min-content constraint)." >> >> I believe we should change this to state that as a minimum it makes the >> declaration invalid. > > And not only that, also the text in the algorithm needs to be updated > too [3]: > "When the grid container is being sized under a min-content constraint, > a track with a flexible min track sizing function is treated as if > its min track sizing function was min-content for the purposes > of this step." > > But now a "track with a flexible min track sizing function" is invalid. Removed. Thanks~ :) ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2016 23:40:06 UTC