- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 18:52:47 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/05/16 17:52, Manuel Rego Casasnovas wrote: > a recent change [1] in the spec makes flex sizes invalid > on the min slot of minmax(): > " <track-size> = > <track-breadth> | > minmax( <inflexible-breadth> , <track-breadth> )" > > However, the text defining minmax() hasn't been updated [2]: > "As a maximum, a <flex> value sets the track’s flex factor. > As a minimum, it is treated as zero (or min-content, > if the grid container is sized under a min-content constraint)." > > I believe we should change this to state that as a minimum it makes the > declaration invalid. And not only that, also the text in the algorithm needs to be updated too [3]: "When the grid container is being sized under a min-content constraint, a track with a flexible min track sizing function is treated as if its min track sizing function was min-content for the purposes of this step." But now a "track with a flexible min track sizing function" is invalid. Bye, Rego > [1] > https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4040ba7fa068905f7fe1c1bf35d665a2062acafa > [2] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#valdef-grid-template-columns-minmax [3] https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/#algo-content
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 16:53:22 UTC