- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:40:27 -0700
- To: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com> wrote: > I would like to go ahead and update all the last ED of all the concerned CSS > specs to change lines like: > > Animatable: no > > to, one of the following > > Animation type: discrete > Animation type: none > > Also, for consistency, I will change lines like "Animatable: yes, as length" > to "Animation type: length". > > I expect I'll make 'length' here link to > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transitions/#animtype-length although long-term > I should probably make rework the Web Animations animation types and point > it there since that includes (or will include) additional definitions such > as how addition works for each type. Obviously newer specs can define their > own animation types inline without referring to Web Animations as indeed > some have already started to do. > > I expect I'll set up the changes as a PR on each spec so that editors have a > chance to give feedback. Don't do this yet; your attempt on Flexbox shows that we have a *severe* usability gap caused by (a) bad markup in Transitions (<b> rather than <dfn>), and (b) no DWIM in Bikeshed. I'll fix both of those issues first, then fix Flexbox proper. Then you can go ahead and do the rest of the specs. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 17:41:14 UTC