- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:19:45 +0900
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> On Mar 29, 2016, at 16:48, Geoffrey Sneddon <me@gsnedders.com> wrote: > But graph-like structures are fun! :) > > There's certainly some extra complexity here from the versioning of the > testsuites. (FWIW, thus far we've avoided any need for versioning for > wpt, which seems to have worked fine.) Going forward, we essentially > have module testsuites which are supersets of the 2.1 testsuite which is > a superset of the 1 testsuite. (Most tests that point to multiple specs > are simply pointing to 2.1 and 3 definitions of the same feature.) > > That said, we haven't exactly maintained the level 1 testsuite, so maybe > we can follow a wpt-like approach and only maintain the latest version. > Maybe that's too radical, though. :) I wasn't actually thinking of multi-level tests, but of cross spec tests, that exercise multiple specs together. > We currently rely upon Apache's .htaccess files, which dependent on the > AllowOverride setting could potentially lead to security issues; we > don't currently actually have any server-side scripts in csswg-test, we > just rely on hixie.ch for that… (and that's something we badly need to > change!). As long as I'm not the one building it, I don't really care how its made, as long as it works :) - Florian
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 10:20:12 UTC