- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:20:22 +0800
- To: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 08:20:54 UTC
On Wednesday 2016-03-09 08:56 +0100, Sebastian Zartner wrote: > The current behavior would be achieved by setting 'border-style' to 'solid'. How would this interact with 'border-image-width', 'border-image-outset', or with 'fill'? It doesn't seem to me that your statement that the current behavior (for non-default values of any of the above features) would be achieved with 'border-style: solid' would be true unless 'border-style: solid' were treated as a magic value that said "do border images the way they're done today". It also seems like this proposal adds extra work to what implementations have to do (in a performance-sensitive area) for relatively little value to developers. I think border images were intended to provide developers with an alternative to the usual border drawing path; imposing much of that path on them thus also seems somewhat counter to the design of the feature. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 08:20:54 UTC