- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:20:22 +0800
- To: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 08:20:54 UTC
On Wednesday 2016-03-09 08:56 +0100, Sebastian Zartner wrote:
> The current behavior would be achieved by setting 'border-style' to 'solid'.
How would this interact with 'border-image-width',
'border-image-outset', or with 'fill'?
It doesn't seem to me that your statement that the current behavior
(for non-default values of any of the above features) would be
achieved with 'border-style: solid' would be true unless
'border-style: solid' were treated as a magic value that said "do
border images the way they're done today".
It also seems like this proposal adds extra work to what
implementations have to do (in a performance-sensitive area) for
relatively little value to developers. I think border images were
intended to provide developers with an alternative to the usual
border drawing path; imposing much of that path on them thus also
seems somewhat counter to the design of the feature.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 08:20:54 UTC