- From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 09:46:00 +0900
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Rachel Nabors <rachelnabors@gmail.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On 2016/03/09 8:59, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > If we think the back-compat isn't bad, tho, I do like this the best. > We'd then get to add a "step" keyword, too, which is a shorthand for > "steps(1)", and gives the default "non-animatable value" behavior. I couldn't work out how to search GitHub for this (since it just ignores braces) but even just searching our Gecko repository I came up a few instances of steps(N).[1] One in some codemirror styles and one in Pocket styles. I'm not sure where next to look for data, but I suspect that this isn't going to work out from a compatibility point of view. discrete() seems good to me unless we can find another way to make steps() work. Brian [1] https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=regexp%3A%22steps%5C(%5Cd%2B%5C)%22+ext%3Ahtml+ext%3Acss&redirect=false&case=true
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2016 00:46:34 UTC