- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 14:35:00 -0800
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:13 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 03/02/2016 05:02 PM, Francois Remy wrote: >> If we are ready to bikeshed this, I think "step" might be better than >> "factor". > > Maybe. But since we're already using counter-increment, > reusing that term seems to make sense? Eh, "increment" there is related to the *verb* increment, as in "increase by some amount". It's not related to the noun increment ("the smallest/most significant units of increase"), which is the concept we're trying to invoke here. I like "increment" less now. I like "step" quite a bit - it's also used by HTML in the <input type=number step> attribute to mean exactly what we want here. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 22:35:47 UTC