- From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:15:55 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 18:37, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > > On 02/29/2016 03:59 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: >> >> That mail only suggests a better name for half the pair. Are you >> suggesting we keep overflow-inline as it is? I'm not sure that's >> great, since it makes overflow / overflow-inline look like a >> short-hand / long-hand pair, which they are not. > > Okay, how about combining them both into the same MQ > > overflow: [ clip | scroll | scroll-page | page ] || [ clip-inline | scroll-inline ] > > Almost nobody will care about overflow-inline, so really want to > make that easy. Media features that can take more than one values aren't a thing that exist as of today. Do we want to introduce that for the sake of this? - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:16:20 UTC