W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2016

Re: [mediaqueries] overflow-block/inline

From: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 19:15:55 +0100
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <D69CEDCD-A7F8-49A0-8CC4-1E0B6B53CFDC@rivoal.net>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 18:37, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> 
> On 02/29/2016 03:59 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote:
>> 
>> That mail only suggests a better name for half the pair. Are you
>> suggesting we keep overflow-inline as it is? I'm not sure that's
>> great, since it makes overflow / overflow-inline look like a
>> short-hand / long-hand pair, which they are not.
> 
> Okay, how about combining them both into the same MQ
> 
>  overflow: [ clip | scroll | scroll-page | page ] || [ clip-inline | scroll-inline ]
> 
> Almost nobody will care about overflow-inline, so really want to
> make that easy.

Media features that can take more than one values aren't a thing that exist as of today. Do we want to introduce that for the sake of this?

 - Florian
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 18:16:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:09:01 UTC