- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:37:11 -0500
- To: Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On 02/29/2016 03:59 AM, Florian Rivoal wrote: > > That mail only suggests a better name for half the pair. Are you > suggesting we keep overflow-inline as it is? I'm not sure that's > great, since it makes overflow / overflow-inline look like a > short-hand / long-hand pair, which they are not. Okay, how about combining them both into the same MQ overflow: [ clip | scroll | scroll-page | page ] || [ clip-inline | scroll-inline ] Almost nobody will care about overflow-inline, so really want to make that easy. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 17:37:42 UTC