- From: Johannes Wilm <johannes@fiduswriter.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 20:21:18 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2016 19:21:47 UTC
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > "clear: block-start" only has useful behavior for page floats. For > other elements, it's currently defined to act identically to "clear: > inline-start". (And "block-end" falls back to acting like > "inline-end".) This seems arbitrary and weird - the axises arent' > interchangeable! > "block-start/end" should either fall back to "both" (if you want to > preserve the fact that it's clearing) or "none" (because the author > messed up and tried to do an invalid clear). I'm not sure which one > is better. fantasai prefers "none". > I would be fine with either one, probably better to use "none". Should we also use "none" if a user tries to float an inline-float to the block-start? > ~TJ and fantasai > > -- Johannes Wilm Fidus Writer http://www.fiduswriter.org
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2016 19:21:47 UTC